Resumen
As representative texts of classical tragedies from the West and East, Euripides’ Medea and Fang Chengpei’s Leifeng Pagoda, though born out of vastly different cultural and historical contexts, reveal a remarkable ideological isomorphism in their portrayals of female figures. Both plays dismantle the traditional tragic narrative of female “submission and sacrifice” and reconstruct the possibility of women as cultural subjects. Medea challenges patriarchal structures of marriage and kinship through radical defiance, while Bai Niangzi resists Confucian ritualism and legal-moral constraints through subtle and persistent opposition. Their rebellion against predetermined fate and social discipline manifests on three levels: the awakening of subjectivity, the display of rational agency, and the enactment of resistance. This paper examines the implicit mechanisms of gender construction within these classical tragedies, aiming to provide new theoretical support for the cross-cultural applicability of feminist critique.
Citas
Ban, Z. (1996). Commandments for Women. (F. Zhang, Ed.). Central University for Nationalities Press.
Beauvoir, S. de. (1953). The Second Sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Jonathan Cape.
Brownmiller, S. (1999). In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution. The Dial Press.
Brulé, P. (2003). Women of Ancient Greece. Edinburgh University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
Chen, J. (2012). Female Images in Classical Athenian Tragedy. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 41(6): 113-118.

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2026 Orientando
